Hi-Stat img
□ ENGLISH
□ HOME
□ プロジェクト概要
組織図

概念図

スタッフ
□ 研究成果
ディスカッションペーパー

データベース
□ お知らせ
公募情報

研究会日程

過去の研究会と報告資料

レクチャーシリーズ

過去のレクチャーと報告資料

ニュースレター
□ リンク
一橋大学

一橋大学附属図書館

一橋大学経済研究所

社会科学統計情報研究センター

アジア長期経済統計プロジェクト

Global Economic History Network

政府統計ミクロデータの試行的提供

ICPSR データアーカイブ

AMU and AMU Deviation indicators

Mind the gap!
International comparisons of productivity in services and goods production



Robert Inklaar, Marcel P. Timmer and Bart van Ark


July, 2006
revised October, 2006


Previous paper Next paper
Abstract
In this paper, we make a comparison of industry output, inputs and productivity growth and levels between seven advanced economies (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, UK and U.S.). Our industry-level growth accounts make use of input data on labour quantity (hours) and composition (schooling levels), and distinguish between six different types of capital assets (including three ICT assets). The comparisons of levels rely on industry-specific purchasing power parities (PPPs) for output and inputs, within a consistent input-output framework for the year 1997. Our results show that differences in productivity growth and levels can mainly be traced to market services, not to goods-producing industries. Part of the strong productivity growth in market services in Anglo-Saxon countries, such as Australia and Canada, may be related to relatively low productivity levels compared to the U.S. In contrast, services productivity levels in continental European countries were on par with the U.S. in 1997, but growth in Europe was much weaker since then. In terms of factor input use, the U.S. is very different from all other countries, mostly because of the more intensive use of ICT capital in the U.S..
Download (473KB)
Copyright (C) 2003-2007 by Institute of Economic Research.All rights reserved.